Professional knowledgeable. "The lawyer is really trying to understand the situation and give me the best advice for every possible way to protect my rights. The lawyer also gives advice on things I didn't request initially but definitely need in the future."
"James is an experienced lawyer who I had the pleasure of working with previously. I highly recommend James."
,
Google10
Oct 2019
James Ford has received 12 LawTap Verified Reviews with an average 4.96 rating to date. Most recent verified review from a client remarked "Really appreciate having your advice and guidance throughout this. Particularly being able to turn around the agreement in such a short time over the past couple of days. Thank you for your timely responses and being available to rush through everything at the end."
"Fabulous lawyer, professional, sincere and genuine...highly recommended. Other lawyers shied away from our tough case but James took it on with verve and vigor. With a highly qualified support team, James has paved the way to settle our case. James has keen attention to detail and a good ability to problem solve. The client has to make the final decisions on matters and quality advice is essential if the correct decisions are to be made, that's what you get from James. I cannot recommend James and Blue Ocean Law Group enough, they are pinnacles in the profession!" [Note: the dispute did not involve Craterpot which is a startup venture Blue Ocean Law Group™ are assisting Rod to bring to market].
Part 4.1 of the Civil Procedure Act 2010 requires 2 Certificates to be filed on commencing a civil proceeding:
1️⃣ This [Form 4A] Overarching Obligations certificate (to be made by parties); and
2️⃣ A Proper Basis Certificate (to be made by lawyers).
✅ Suitable for the County Court of Victoria under the Civil Procedure Procedure Act 2010 (Vic);
✅ Recommended only for use by legal professionals +/or at a minimum with review by a legal professional prior to filing with the Court;
Embedded Lawyer-Logic™ dynamically adapts to your answers to provide valuable guidance and help you avoid errors.
Parties MUST certify that they have read and understood the Overarching Obligations and the Paramount Duty.
s.41(1) of the Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic).
A Certification MUST be filed with the first Substantive Document in the civil proceeding filed by each party.
s. 41(2) of the Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic).
Further reading: FAQ ➲ What are the Certification Requirements in Victorian Courts?
The Overarching Obligations apply in respect of the conduct of any part of a civil proceeding of a court (Civil Procedure Act 2010 s11).
⚖️ This includes interlocutory applications, appeals, and any appropriate dispute resolution undertaken in relation to a civil proceeding.
There is one Paramount Duty and a further 10 Overarching Obligations.
The Paramount Duty is a duty to the court to further the administration of justice in relation to any civil proceeding (s16).
One manifestation of this Paramount Duty is the duty of lawyers to accurately inform the court of the parameters of the case and the factual and legal issues for determination.
Inaccurate or misleading opening submissions, or submissions which do not have a proper factual or legal basis can impede the administration of justice by leading to a waste of court time and resources (Stagliano (as administrator of the Estate of Manlio, dec'd) v Scerri [2016] VSC 130 at [25]).
The Overarching Obligations are to:
1️⃣ Act honestly (s17)
2️⃣ Only make claims that have a proper basis (s18)
3️⃣ Only take steps to resolve or determine the dispute (s19)
4️⃣ Cooperate in the conduct of the civil proceeding (s20)
5️⃣ Not mislead or deceive (s21)
6️⃣ Use reasonable endeavours to resolve the dispute (s22)
7️⃣ Narrow the issues in dispute (s23)
8️⃣ Ensure costs are reasonable and proportionate (s24)
9️⃣ Minimise delay (s25)
🔟 Disclose the existence of documents critical to the dispute (s26).
Further reading: FAQ ➲ What are the Overarching Obligations in Victorian Courts and Who Do They Apply To?
The Overarching Obligations do not apply to witnesses other than expert witnesses (s10(2)).
In Giles v Jeffrey [2016] VSCA 314, the Court of Appeal tentatively held that, as a consequence, the Overarching Obligations do not apply in relation to a party giving evidence as a witness. Rather, a party giving evidence as a witness has two capacities and the Overarching Obligations only apply to the party’s capacity as a party and not as a witness.
However, the Court noted that it was not necessary to form a concluded view on this issue because, even if the Overarching Obligations did apply to a party acting as a witness, a breach had not occurred (at [91]-[109]).
However, it should be noted that not all of the Overarching Obligations apply to expert witnesses.
The following Overarching Obligations do NOT apply to expert witnesses:
❌ The obligation to only make claims that have a proper basis (s18);
❌ The obligation to only take steps to resolve or determine the dispute (s19);
❌ The obligation to use reasonable endeavours to resolve the dispute (s22);
❌ The obligation to disclose the existence of documents critical to the dispute (s26).
The reference to a ‘person who provides assistance to a party and in doing so exercises control or influence over the proceeding’ may include a company director.
In Commissioner for State Revenue Victoria v Carmrer [2014] VSC 571, the plaintiff alleged that the sole director of the defendant companies had provided financial assistance to those companies. In the absence of evidence as to how the companies’ cases were financed, Efthim AsJ noted that there was a strong inference that the sole director, as the companies’ ‘guiding mind’, was funding the defendant companies.
In those circumstances, the director bore the evidential burden of showing no financial assistance was provided.
In the case, the director failed to discharge that burden.
The Overarching Obligations regime has a particular application to legal practitioners in Victorian Courts..
3 points should be noted:
1️⃣ The Overarching Obligations do not override any duty or obligation of a legal practitioner to a client to the extent that the overarching obligations can operate consistently (s13(1));
2️⃣ A legal practitioner or law practice MUST not cause a client to contravene the overarching obligations (s14);
3️⃣ Nothing in the Civil Procedure Act 2010 overrides any duty or obligation of a legal practitioner to the court whether arising under the common law, by statute, or otherwise (s15).
Further reading: FAQ ➲ How do the Overarching Obligations Apply to Lawyers in Victorian Courts?
A Victorian Court may take into account a contravention of the Overarching Obligations in exercising any power in relation to a civil proceeding (Civil Procedure Act 2010 s28).
If the Court is satisfied on the balance of probabilities that there has been a breach the Court may make any order it considers appropriate in the interests of justice.
This includes:
1️⃣ An order that a person pay the costs and expenses arising out of a contravention;
2️⃣ An order that legal costs be payable immediately and enforceable immediately;
3️⃣ An order that a person pay compensation for financial loss that was materially contributed to by a contravention;
4️⃣ An order that a person take steps to remedy a contravention;
5️⃣ An order that a person not be permitted to take certain steps in the proceeding;
6️⃣ Any other order the court considers to be in the interests of a person prejudicially affected by the contravention (Civil Procedure Act 2010 s29(1)).
Further reading: FAQ ➲ Contravention of the Overarching Obligations: What Powers Do Victorian Courts Have?
In some instances, a statute or insurance contract means that a party has no meaningful control over the conduct of a civil proceeding.
In this event, the person in control of the proceeding as a result of the operation of the statute or insurance contract may make the Overarching Obligations certification (s41(4)).
A party who is legally represented is not required to comply with the Overarching Obligations certification requirements if they are currently, or have been, involved in more than one civil proceeding and have personally made the Overarching Obligations certification in other civil proceedings in the same jurisdiction within two years prior to the current proceeding.
This period may be altered by court rules (41(5)(a)).
The party’s legal practitioner MUST certify that this is the case (s41(5)(b)).
The content and form of the Certification Requirements are set out in the rules of the higher courts and, for the Magistrates’ Court, in a Practice Direction.
These are:
➲ We recommend you contact our legal team to obtain legal advice and guidance.
Source:
The above information was extracted from the Civil Procedure Bench Book published by the Judicial College of Victoria.
Enter the code WHen you pay full price to Purchase one of the following Self Service documents:
Re-Enter the code at checkout each time you buy the following documents to get a discount:
Part 4.1 of the Civil Procedure Act 2010 requires 2 Certificates to be filed on commencing a civil proceeding:
1️⃣ An Overarching Obligations certificate (to be made by parties); and
2️⃣ A Proper Basis Certificate (to be made by lawyers).
MUST be filed with the first Substantive Document in the civil proceeding filed by each party.
s. 41(2) of the Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic).
Section 3 defines ‘Substantive Document’ as:
(a) an originating motion;
(b) a writ that includes—
(i) a statement of claim; or
(ii) a statement sufficient to give, with reasonable particularity, notice of the nature of the claim, its cause and the relief or remedy sought;
(c) a complaint;
(d) a defence or a notice of defence;
(e) a reply;
(f) a counterclaim;
(g) an answer to a counterclaim or a response to an answer to a counterclaim;
(h) a claim by third party notice or a response to a claim by third party notice;
(i) a claim by fourth or subsequent party notice or a response to a claim by fourth or subsequent party notice;
(j) an application brought in accordance with section 93(4)(d) of the Transport Accident Act 1986 or a response to an application brought in accordance with that section;
(k) an affidavit which commences a civil proceeding or an affidavit which is the first response of a party in a civil proceeding;
(l) a summons which commences a civil proceeding or a summons which is the first response of a party in a civil proceeding;
(m) an application which commences a civil proceeding or an application which is the first response of a party in a civil proceeding;
(n) a notice of referral under section 80 of the Land Acquisition and Compensation Act 1986 or a response to a notice of referral under that Act;
(o) a claim for contribution against another party under Part IV of the Wrongs Act 1958 or a response to a claim for contribution against another party under that Part;
(p) an application for leave to appear and defend under the Instruments Act 1958;
(q) a claim for preliminary discovery;
But does NOT include—
(r) a summons for taxation of costs;
(s) an application to a court for punishment of a person for contempt of court;
(t) an application for a rehearing under section 110 of the Magistrates’ Court Act 1989;
(u) an application under section 60(2) of the Accident Compensation Act 1985;
(v) an application under section 24 of the Second-Hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 1989;
(w) an application under section 83 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004;
(x) any process which commences an appeal or any process which is the first response of a party to an appeal;
(y) any process which commences proceedings under the Corporations Act or the ASIC Act or any process which is the first response of a party to proceedings under either of those Acts;
(z) any originating motion filed under Chapter III of the Rules of the Supreme Court.
A party’s legal practitioner MUST make Proper Basis Certification whenever it files its first Substantive Document or when it files any subsequent Substantive Document which:
⚖️ Adds or substitutes a party;
⚖️ Makes, adds or substitutes a claim or cause of action;
⚖️ Makes, adds or substitutes a substantive defence or substantive matter by way of response or reply;
⚖️ Makes, adds or substitutes a material allegation, denial or non-admission of fact or law;
⚖️ Makes any significant amendment to a first substantive document or a subsequent substantive document (s42(1)).
Court rules may be made which provide for other circumstances in which Proper Basis Certification MUST be made, or the court may direct that certification be made in any proceeding (s42(1)).
Source:
This FAQ is extracted from the Civil Procedure Bench Book published by the Judicial College of Victoria.
Important Notice:
This FAQ is intended for general interest + information only.
It is not legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or used as such.
We recommend you always consult a lawyer for legal advice specifically tailored to your needs & circumstances.
Subscribe for FREE access to our growing list of [350+] personal and/or business legal documents.
View PricingClose