It is often assumed that a court judgment made after a dispute arises under a Contract will automatically be enforceable against the other party (even where they reside or are based overseas).
The best way to set the record straight and demonstrate the importance of Arbitral Awards when dealing with parties from particular countries is to provide by way of example a list of the countries where an Australian Judgment has automatic reciprocal recognition versus the recognition an equivalent Australian Arbitral Award might receive under the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958) (the "New York Convention").
FAQ: What foreign Court judgments have reciprocal recognition for enforcement in Australia?
Entry into force: The Convention entered into force on 7 June 1959 (Article XII).
Status: This table lists the current status of the signatory countries to the Convention
To help make sense of the status levels please refer to the following defintions which apply to the critical stage of consenting to be bound by the convention
Ratification
Ratification defines the international act whereby a state indicates its consent to be bound to a treaty if the parties intended to show their consent by such an act.
In the case of bilateral treaties, ratification is usually accomplished by exchanging the requisite instruments, while in the case of multilateral treaties the usual procedure is for the depositary to collect the ratifications of all states, keeping all parties informed of the situation.
The institution of ratification grants states the necessary time-frame to seek the required approval for the treaty on the domestic level and to enact the necessary legislation to give domestic effect to that treaty
Accession
"Accession" is the act whereby a state accepts the offer or the opportunity to become a party to a treaty already negotiated and signed by other states.
It has the same legal effect as ratification.
Accession usually occurs after the treaty has entered into force.
For more glossary terms, visit the UN Treaty Website’s Glossary of terms relating to Treaty actions.
Especially when dealing with International Commerce (but also in Domestic Commerce) it is critical that the parties to any Contract carefully consider what will occur if a dispute arises, including:
⚖️ The Dispute Resolution Process (and if that is unsuccessful);
⚖️ How the matter can be finally decided and the estimated costs typically involved in the chosen Forum;
⚖️ The seat (location) of the Arbitration;
⚖️ The language or languages to be used in the Arbitral Proceedings;
⚖️ Whether the Abitral Proceedings are to be confidential (and under what circumstances confidential information may be disclosed);
⚖️ Whether the Arbitration Proceedings are to be conducted by way or oral hearings for the presentation of evidence or for oral argument, or whether the proceedings are to be conducted solely via written submissions;
⚖️ Whether a court may determine a preliminary point of law;
⚖️ The applicable Arbitration Rules;
⚖️ The number of Arbitrators, whether a majority or unanimous decision is required, and whether one Arbitrator is to be appointed as a Presiding Arbitrator to solely determine questions of procedure;
⚖️ The procedure for appointing the Arbitrator or Arbitrators;
⚖️ The procedure for challenging the appointment of an Arbitrator;
⚖️ The power of the Arbitral Tribunal to grant interim measures;
⚖️ Whether or not one or more Experts can be appointed to report on specific issues to be determined by the Arbitral Tribunal;
⚖️ Whether the costs of an Arbitration (including the fees and expenses of the Arbitrator or Arbitrators) are to be pre-allocated or to be in the discretion of the Arbitral Tribunal;
⚖️ How to deal with the costs in the event of an aborted or failed Arbitration;
⚖️ Whether interest at a pre-agreed rate or such reasonable rate as the Arbitral Tribunal decides is to apply on an award for the payment of money;
⚖️ Avenues of Appeal (if any);
⚖️ Applicable Law for both the Contract and the Arbitration;
⚖️ Enforcement;
⚖️ Security +/or Personal Guarantees, etc.
The ICC International Chamber of Commerce provides dispute resolution services including Arbitration.
Whilst parties can agree to undertake Arbitration after a dispute arises, it is best practice for the parties to discuss and agree whether or not to include an Arbitation Clause in their Contract before it is executed by the parties.
Many of the above matters may be automatically dealt with by the agreed applicable Arbitration Rules which as general designed to provide for default positions where the parties omit the matter from their Arbitration Clause.
It is important for the parties to understand the default positions imposed by their agreed applicable Arbitration Rules so that they can negotiate changes where necessary.
This Self-Service Arbitration Clause generator uses Embedded Lawyer-Logic™ to step you through the below guidelines to automatically generate and email you a draft ICC Arbitration Clause based on your responses. If you need assistance to best understand the implications of each query being asked, we offer Lawyer-Assisted and Full Service depending on the complexity of your circumstances, and requirements.
The following text has been extracted from the Standard ICC Arbitration Clause (English Guide).
It is recommended that parties wishing to make reference to ICC Arbitration in their contracts use the standard clause below.
All disputes arising out of or in connection with the present contract shall be finally settled under the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce by one or more arbitrators appointed in accordance with the said Rules.
Parties are free to adapt the above Standard ICC Arbitration Clause to their particular circumstances.
For instance, they may wish to stipulate the number of arbitrators, given that the ICC Arbitration Rules contain a presumption in favour of a sole arbitrator.
Also, it may be desirable for them to stipulate the place and language of the arbitration and the law applicable to the merits.
The ICC Arbitration Rules do not limit the parties’ free choice of the place and language of the arbitration or the laws governing both the contract and the arbitration.
When adapting the clause, care must be taken to avoid any risk of ambiguity.
Unclear wording in the clause will cause uncertainty and delay and can hinder or even compromise the dispute resolution process.
Parties should also take account of any factors that may affect the enforceability of the clause under applicable law.
These include any mandatory requirements that may exist at the place of arbitration and the expected place or places of enforcement.
If the parties wish to exclude any recourse to the Emergency Arbitrator Provisions, they must expressly opt out by adding the following wording to the clause above:
The Emergency Arbitrator Provisions shall not apply.
The ICC Arbitration Rules provide for use of an expedited procedure in lower-value cases.
If parties wish to exclude the application of the Expedited Procedure Provisions, they must expressly opt out by adding the following wording to the clause above:
The Expedited Procedure Provisions shall not apply.
Parties wishing to avail themselves of the expedited procedure in higher-value cases should expressly opt in by adding the following wording to the clause above:
The parties agree, pursuant to Article 30(2)(b) of the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce, that the Expedited Procedure Rules shall apply irrespective of the amount in dispute.
If parties wish the ceiling for the application of the Expedited Procedure Rules to be higher than that specified in those Rules, the following wording should be added to the clause above:
The parties agree, pursuant to Article 30(2)(b) of the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce, that the Expedited Procedure Rules shall apply, provided the amount in dispute does not exceed US$ [specify amount] at the time of the communication referred to in Article 1(3) of the Expedited Procedure Rules.
All disputes arising out of or in connection with the present Contract shall be finally settled under the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce by one or more arbitrators appointed in accordance with the said Rules.
No award or procedural order made in the arbitration shall be published.
ICC Arbitration may be used as the forum for final determination of a dispute following an attempt at settlement by other means such as Mediation.
Parties wishing to include in their contracts a tiered dispute resolution clause combining ICC Arbitration with ICC Mediation should refer to the standard clauses relating to the ICC Mediation Rules.
Other combinations of services are also possible.
For instance, Arbitration may be used as a fallback to expertise or dispute boards.
Also, parties who resort to ICC Arbitration may wish to provide for recourse to the ICC International Centre for ADR for the proposal of an expert if an expert opinion is required in the course of the Arbitration.
Standard clauses for these and other combinationsof services are available in several languages here.
For more information about inserting an ICC Arbitration Clause into your Contract to refer disputes to the ICC International Chamber of Commerce you can download the Standard ICC Arbitration Clause brochure in English (many other languages are available).
Social Sharing Image: Courtesy of Ian Taylor on Unsplash
Relevant Australian legislation:
The International Arbitration Act 1974 of the Commonwealth covers International Commercial Arbitrations and the enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
For Domestic Commercial Arbitration, each state or territory will generally have their own local laws.
For e.g., see Commercial Arbitration Act 2010 (NSW).
Enter the code WHen you pay full price to Purchase one of the following Self Service documents:
Re-Enter the code at checkout each time you buy the following documents to get a discount:
The following is a list of the Foreign Countries extracted from the Foreign Judgments Regulations 1992 (Comm.) with arrangements as at 1 December 2021 to recognise Australian Court judgments which in turn may be recognised and capable of registration in Australian Courts:
Regulation 4 ➲ Schedule Superior Courts
1A
Province of Alberta, Canada
Supreme Court of Canada
Court of Appeal of Alberta
Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta
2
Bahamas, The Commonwealth of the
Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
3
Province of British Columbia, Canada
Supreme Court of Canada
Court of Appeal of British Columbia
Supreme Court of British Columbia
4
British Virgin Islands
Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court
5
Cayman Islands
Grand Court
6
Dominica,
Commonwealth of
Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court
Court of Appeal
High Court of Justice
7
Falkland Islands
Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
8
Fiji, Republic of
Supreme Court
Court of Appeal
High Court
9
France (French Republic)
Cour de Cassation
Cours d'Appel
Tribunaux de grand instance
Tribunaux de commerce
Cours d'assise
Tribunaux correctionnels
10
Germany, Federal
Republic of
Bundesgerichtshof
Oberlandesgerichte
Bayerische Oberste Landesgericht
Landgerichte
11
Gibraltar
Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
12
Grenada
Supreme Court (consisting of the:
Court of Appeal; High Court)
13
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China, The
Court of Final Appeal
High Court
(consisting of the: Court of Appeal; Court of First Instance)
14
Israel, State of
Supreme Court
District Courts
Moslem Religious Courts
Druze Religious Courts
15
Italy (Italian Republic)
Corte Suprema di Cassazione
Corte di Assise
Corte d'Appello
Tribunale
16
Japan
Supreme Court
High Courts
District Courts
Family Courts
16A
Korea, Republic of
Supreme Court
Appellate Courts
District Courts
Family Court
Patent Court
Administrative Court
16B
Malawi
High Court
Supreme Court
17
Province of Manitoba, Canada
Court of the Queen's Bench of Manitoba
18
Montserrat
Privy Council
Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal
High Court of Montserrat
19
Papua New Guinea
Supreme Court of Justice National Court of Justice
19A
Poland, Republic of
Supreme Court
Commercial Courts
Courts of Appeal
Provincial Courts
20
St Helena
Supreme Court
21
St Kitts and Nevis, Federation of
Privy Council
Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal
High Court (Saint Christopher Circuit)
High Court (Nevis Circuit)
22
St Vincent and the Grenadines
Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (consisting of the:
Court of Appeal,
High Court)
23
Seychelles, Republic of
Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
24
Singapore, Republic of
Privy Council: in respect of orders made on appeals from the Singapore Supreme Court and filed with the Court of Appeal of Singapore
Supreme Court of Singapore (consisting of the: Court of Appeal; High Court)
25
Solomon Islands
Court of Appeal
High Court
25A
Sri Lanka
Supreme Court
Court of Appeal
High Court
District Court
25AA
Switzerland
Bundesgericht
Kantonale Obere Gerichte
Handelsgerichte
25AB
Taiwan
Supreme Court
High Courts
District Courts
25B
Tonga
Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
26
Tuvalu
Court of Appeal
High Court
27
United Kingdom, The
Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
Senior Courts of England and Wales
Court of Judicature of Northern Ireland
Court of Session
28
Western Samoa
Court of Appeal
Supreme Court of Western Samoa
Note: The Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court is constituted by Statutory Instrument 1967 No. 223, as amended by Statutory Instrument 1983 No. 1108, of the United Kingdom.
The Court is differently described in the usage of the countries mentioned in the Schedule in relation to which it is listed as a superior court.
The description used by each of those countries is set out in column 3 of the relevant item in the Schedule.
✅ Reseal of Probate (see below discussion).
(2) Part 2 of the Act extends in relation to the following inferior courts of the United Kingdom:
(a) County Courts (England and Wales);
(b) County Courts (Northern Ireland);
(c) Sheriff Courts (Scotland).
(3) Part 2 of the Act extends in relation to the following inferior courts of Canada:
(a) the Provincial Court of Alberta;
(b) the Provincial Court of British Columbia;
(c) the Provincial Court of Manitoba.
(4) Part 2 of the Act extends in relation to the following inferior courts of Switzerland:
(a) Bezirksgerichte;
(b) Erstinstanzliche Gerichte;
(c) Arbeitsgerichte;
(d) Mietgerichte.
(6) Part 2 of the Act extends in relation to each District Court of the Republic of Poland.
Please read our FAQ: What types of New Zealand (NZ) Court judgments can and cannot be registered for Enforcement in Australia?
➲ If a deceased had assets in different states of Australia or in certain countries, namely Commonwealth countries where the Queen is the head of state, then it is generally possible to have a Grant of Probate issued by a Court in one jurisdiction recognised in another state or country.
This process of recognising the grant made in the other state or country is called resealing the grant.
NSW Reseal of Probate example:
Not all Grants from other countries can be resealed by the Supreme Court of NSW.
The Probate Court will only reseal Grants made in countries of the "Commonwealth Realm" where the Queen is, or was at the time of the grant, Head of State.
Such countries include the United Kingdom (England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland), New Zealand, Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands.
Recent grants from the following countries cannot be resealed: Malta, South Africa, Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Fiji, Hong Kong or The Republic of Ireland.
If a grant cannot be resealed then it may be necessary to apply for a new Grant of Probate in NSW.
Credits:
This FAQ was created by James D. Ford GAICD | Principal Solicitor, Blue Ocean Law Group℠.
Important Notice:
This FAQ is intended for general interest + information only.
It is not legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or used as such.
We recommend you always consult a lawyer for legal advice specifically tailored to your needs & circumstances.
The following is a non-exhaustive list of the types of NZ judgments can be registered for enforcement via the Australian Courts:
✅ Money judgments;
✅ Non-money judgments (only if not excluded by the regulations);
✅ Judgments in criminal proceedings that involve an obligation to pay an Injured party compensation, damages or reparation;
✅ Judgments that involve a regulatory regime criminal fine;
✅ Judgments in Market Proceedings;
✅ Judgments registered under the Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments Act 1934 (NZ); and
✅ Reseal of Probate (see below discussion).
❌ Orders under proceeds of crime legislation;
❌ In specified circumstances detailed in the regulations relating to orders in whole or in part made by a NZ Court under the Insolvency (Cross-Border) Act 2006 (NZ).
❌ Orders relating to the granting of probate or letters of administration - for orders of this type you will need to consider whether the relevant Australian State or Territory Probate Court will reseal the grant.
For more information, please see the discussion and example below.
❌ Guardianship orders;
❌ Non-money judgments (if excluded by the regulations);
❌ Orders relating to the welfare, control and care of a child;
❌ Judgments which are not final and conclusive (including freezing orders); and
❌ Judgments which are not enforceable in the original New Zealand Court or Tribunal.
➲ If a deceased had assets in different states of Australia or in certain countries, namely Commonwealth countries where the Queen is the head of state, then it is generally possible to have a Grant of Probate issued by a Court in one jurisdiction recognised in another state or country.
This process of recognising the grant made in the other state or country is called resealing the grant.
NSW Reseal of Probate example:
Not all Grants from other countries can be resealed by the Supreme Court of NSW.
The Probate Court will only reseal Grants made in countries of the "Commonwealth Realm" where the Queen is, or was at the time of the grant, Head of State.
Such countries include the United Kingdom (England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland), New Zealand, Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands.
Recent grants from the following countries cannot be resealed: Malta, South Africa, Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Fiji, Hong Kong or The Republic of Ireland.
If a grant cannot be resealed then it may be necessary to apply for a new Grant of Probate in NSW.
Credits:
This FAQ was created by James D. Ford GAICD | Principal Solicitor, Blue Ocean Law Group℠.
Important Notice:
This FAQ is intended for general interest + information only.
It is not legal advice, nor should it be relied upon or used as such.
We recommend you always consult a lawyer for legal advice specifically tailored to your needs & circumstances.
Subscribe for FREE access to our growing list of [350+] personal and/or business legal documents.
View PricingClose