Professional knowledgeable. "The lawyer is really trying to understand the situation and give me the best advice for every possible way to protect my rights. The lawyer also gives advice on things I didn't request initially but definitely need in the future."
"James is an experienced lawyer who I had the pleasure of working with previously. I highly recommend James."
,
Google10
Oct 2019
James Ford has received 12 LawTap Verified Reviews with an average 4.96 rating to date. Most recent verified review from a client remarked "Really appreciate having your advice and guidance throughout this. Particularly being able to turn around the agreement in such a short time over the past couple of days. Thank you for your timely responses and being available to rush through everything at the end."
"Fabulous lawyer, professional, sincere and genuine...highly recommended. Other lawyers shied away from our tough case but James took it on with verve and vigor. With a highly qualified support team, James has paved the way to settle our case. James has keen attention to detail and a good ability to problem solve. The client has to make the final decisions on matters and quality advice is essential if the correct decisions are to be made, that's what you get from James. I cannot recommend James and Blue Ocean Law Group enough, they are pinnacles in the profession!" [Note: the dispute did not involve Craterpot which is a startup venture Blue Ocean Law Group™ are assisting Rod to bring to market].
See UCPR Part 22 for more information.
You can only object to being ordered to answer interrogatories if:
⚖️ The interrogatory does not relate to any issue in dispute between that party and the party seeking the order,
⚖️ The interrogatory is vexatious or oppressive, or
⚖️ The answer to the interrogatory could disclose privileged information (see UCPR 22.2).
If you do not sufficiently answer or fail to answer an interrogatory, the court may make further orders against you including:
⚖️ An order that you attend to be orally examined (see UCPR 22.4),
⚖️ Giving judgment against you (see UCPR 22.5),
⚖️ If you are acting for a plaintiff, an order that your proceedings be stayed or dismissed (see UCPR 22.5), or
⚖️ If you are acting for a defendant, an order that your defence be struck out (see UCPR 22.5).
✅ Suitable for the NSW Courts under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (NSW) 2005;
✅ Recommended only for use by legal professionals +/or at a minimum with review by a legal professional prior to filing with the Court;
✅ For use in all NSW Court registries for all NSW Courts including Local (General & Small Claims), District (All Lists^), Supreme (Common Law & Equity Divisions) and all Appeals to the NSW Court of Appeal.
Embedded Lawyer-Logic™ dynamically adapts to your answers to provide valuable guidance and help you avoid errors.
The preparation and filing of a Statement of Answers to Interrogatories has important strategic legal implications.
In short, due to the complexities involved:
➲ We recommend you contact our legal team to obtain legal advice and guidance.
Important Notes:
The party filing this Form is required to serve a copy of the filed Form together with all other filed documents on all other parties to the proceeding.
Enter the code WHen you pay full price to Purchase one of the following Self Service documents:
Re-Enter the code at checkout each time you buy the following documents to get a discount:
Subscribe for FREE access to our growing list of [350+] personal and/or business legal documents.
View PricingClose