Professional knowledgeable. "The lawyer is really trying to understand the situation and give me the best advice for every possible way to protect my rights. The lawyer also gives advice on things I didn't request initially but definitely need in the future."
"James is an experienced lawyer who I had the pleasure of working with previously. I highly recommend James."
,
Google10
Oct 2019
James Ford has received 12 LawTap Verified Reviews with an average 4.96 rating to date. Most recent verified review from a client remarked "Really appreciate having your advice and guidance throughout this. Particularly being able to turn around the agreement in such a short time over the past couple of days. Thank you for your timely responses and being available to rush through everything at the end."
"Fabulous lawyer, professional, sincere and genuine...highly recommended. Other lawyers shied away from our tough case but James took it on with verve and vigor. With a highly qualified support team, James has paved the way to settle our case. James has keen attention to detail and a good ability to problem solve. The client has to make the final decisions on matters and quality advice is essential if the correct decisions are to be made, that's what you get from James. I cannot recommend James and Blue Ocean Law Group enough, they are pinnacles in the profession!" [Note: the dispute did not involve Craterpot which is a startup venture Blue Ocean Law Group™ are assisting Rod to bring to market].
See UCPR 38.5 for more information.
This [Form 56] is the standard form of questions that a Registrar will use when examining a person in relation to a Judgment Debtor who is a Corporation.
You may use this [Form 56] as a guide if you (as Judgment Creditor) are required to examine a person in relation to a Judgment Debtor who is a Corporation.
(cf DCR Part 32, rules 1 and 5; LCR Part 28, rules 1 and 3)
(1) Unless the court orders otherwise, examination of a person under an order for examination is to be conducted by the person on whose application the order was made.
(2) Examination of a person under an order for examination may be conducted by the court if--
(a) the person attends for examination following his or her arrest pursuant to a warrant issued under section 97 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 as a consequence of the person's failure to comply with an order for examination, or
(b) the person attends for examination otherwise than at the time specified in the order, or
(c) the court is satisfied for any other reason that the circumstances so warrant.
(3) If the examination of a person under an order for examination is conducted by the court--
(a) the person may be required to answer questions on oath, and
(b) the examination may be conducted in open court or in the absence of the public, as the court directs, and
(c) the court must notify the person on whose application the order was made of the person's answers to the questions asked at the examination.
(4) An examination under this rule may be adjourned from time to time, as occasion requires.
(5) In this rule--
"order for examination" means an order for examination referred to in rule 38.3.
✅ Suitable for the NSW Courts under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (NSW) 2005;
✅ Recommended only for use by legal professionals +/or at a minimum with review by a legal professional prior to filing with the Court;
✅ For use in all NSW Court registries for all NSW Courts including Local (General & Small Claims), District (All Lists^), Supreme (Common Law & Equity Divisions).
Embedded Lawyer-Logic™ dynamically adapts to your answers to provide valuable guidance and help you avoid errors.
Enter the code WHen you pay full price to Purchase one of the following Self Service documents:
Re-Enter the code at checkout each time you buy the following documents to get a discount:
Subscribe for FREE access to our growing list of [350+] personal and/or business legal documents.
View PricingClose