Professional knowledgeable. "The lawyer is really trying to understand the situation and give me the best advice for every possible way to protect my rights. The lawyer also gives advice on things I didn't request initially but definitely need in the future."
"James is an experienced lawyer who I had the pleasure of working with previously. I highly recommend James."
,
Google10
Oct 2019
James Ford has received 12 LawTap Verified Reviews with an average 4.96 rating to date. Most recent verified review from a client remarked "Really appreciate having your advice and guidance throughout this. Particularly being able to turn around the agreement in such a short time over the past couple of days. Thank you for your timely responses and being available to rush through everything at the end."
"Fabulous lawyer, professional, sincere and genuine...highly recommended. Other lawyers shied away from our tough case but James took it on with verve and vigor. With a highly qualified support team, James has paved the way to settle our case. James has keen attention to detail and a good ability to problem solve. The client has to make the final decisions on matters and quality advice is essential if the correct decisions are to be made, that's what you get from James. I cannot recommend James and Blue Ocean Law Group enough, they are pinnacles in the profession!" [Note: the dispute did not involve Craterpot which is a startup venture Blue Ocean Law Group™ are assisting Rod to bring to market].
See UCPR 38.6 for more information.
This [Form 58] Arrest Warrant for failure to attend an Examination is prepared and issued by the Registrar:
1️⃣ If an Arrest Warrant is issued or revoked by the Court of its own motion; or
2️⃣ On the application of the person in whose favour a judgment or order has been given or made using a [Form 57] Notice of Motion ➲ Arrest Warrant for Examination.
(cf Act No 9 1973, section 92; Act No 11 1970, section 42; DCR Part 32, rule 6; LCR Part 28, rule 7)
A warrant issued under section 97 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 as a consequence of a person's failure to comply with an order for examination referred to in rule 38.3--
(a) may be issued or revoked by the court of its own motion or on the application of the person in whose favour a judgment or order has been given or made, and
(b) MUST be expressed to expire no later than 3 months after the date on which it is issued, and
(c) may not be issued in relation to a person's failure to comply with an order for examination earlier than 14 days, nor later than 3 months, after the court has served notice on the person to whom the order for examination is addressed that failure to attend for examination may result in the person's arrest.
✅ Suitable for the NSW Courts under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (NSW) 2005.
Enter the code WHen you pay full price to Purchase one of the following Self Service documents:
Re-Enter the code at checkout each time you buy the following documents to get a discount:
Subscribe for FREE access to our growing list of [350+] personal and/or business legal documents.
View PricingClose